Why workshop?

A while ago I mentioned on Twitter that I had booked myself a place on a photography workshop. Someone commented on this in what felt like a throw-away remark, saying they had never seen the point of going on workshops. So I – in 140 characters! – sought to explain why this was important to me. Now that I’m just back from the workshop I booked on at the time, I thought I’d try and say more about it, and include some images from the time away (these are just the digital ones – I have yet to take the film rolls to be developed).

Achnahaird Bay

Achnahaird Bay

Firstly, it’s worth noting that I have no formal artistic training (unlike my correspondent, who has, I think, a degree in art/photography), and so for me, I hope that a workshop can serve partly to teach me something. Secondly, having a pretty intense full-time job means that if I get the time to go and photograph for a few days and do nothing but think about photography, that is really fantastic!  The week was a proper holiday, and I didn’t read a single academic text whilst away (even though I did have a book with me… I rarely travel without one!).

Thirdly, and most importantly for me, engaging with a photographer leading a workshop is about having someone critique what I do and help me move forward in my thinking and my photography.

Loch Bad a' Ghaill

Loch Bad a' Ghaill

My week away was with Bruce Percy, who has been running workshops for several years now.  Exactly two years before going on this Assynt workshop, I went (with my neighbour, Mabel Forsyth) to Torridon on one of his weekend workshops.  That was a great experience, as I wrote about here at the time.  So I was confident the week in Assynt would be a good week.

There are some people who seem to be workshop-regulars, going from one to the next all the time. I am not like that: I have attended a couple of other day-workshops in recent years, but have not been on residential workshops other than the one in Torridon and this one in Assynt.  So if you’re wanting me to offer comparisons, I can’t do so (though I have now heard quite a few horror stories of other workshops, some by really famous photographers… and no, I won’t say more on this).  My main purpose in going to Assynt with Bruce was that I wanted to rediscover something about my own reasoning and motivation for making photographs – especially landscapes – that I had found increasingly difficult to identify in recent times.  I felt I knew enough theory in terms of operating my cameras (though of course, Bruce was able to help me improve in certain areas, such as my exposures and hyperfocal focusing). But I felt I needed input on more important things, especially aspects of composition and how and why I frame the way I do or give more attention to certain things in a scene, and what all that says about my own ‘visioning process’ (sorry, I think that is a rather horrible phrase, but I can’t think of a more suitable one; pre-visualisation covers some of it, but is not the same thing).

Glencanisp Lodge, with view to Suilven

Glencanisp Lodge, with view to Suilven

Of course, this is not something that I discussed in any detail with Bruce before or during the workshop, because I knew from previous experience that this might come anyway – and it did.  One of the two key things for me in thinking about a workshop is that I have to like the photographs that the workshop leader makes, and I really love Bruce’s work – it offers depth and challenge, simplicity and elegance, in both his landscapes and portraits. Of course, I have no desire to create images that are like Bruce’s, even if I could do so, since they represent his vision and not mine; however, I feel I can relate to his vision. I have come to realise that the other key thing for me is that I have to feel I can connect to the leader, and that he or she can connect to me.  Of course, I’m privileged in that I was able to go on the Torridon workshop with Bruce and I therefore knew him a little already; and we’ve also become friends over the last couple of years – that is not something that is necessarily open to people who don’t live in the next neighbourhood to a workshop leader!  But it is possible to at least gain some impression of the person from their images and their writings (such as their blog) and this offers good clues.  And, of course, you can trust my recommendation that Bruce is a great workshop leader! :)

So, is it possible to sum up what it was that I gained from Bruce’s input? There are a number of things that come to mind, but the main one for me can be outlined in the following terms.  At the beginning of the week, he noted that he sometimes found it difficult to understand exactly what I was seeing and why I had gone for a certain composition (I did say this was perhaps because the images were no good, but Bruce disagreed!).  A day or two later he began to suggest that my visualising of scenes was perhaps too selective – I tended to visualise one or two really significant elements in a potential image, but I did not always frame these in a way that meant they were as apparent as I wanted them to be, whether this be unusual shapes, repeated lines, patterns on hills, the interplay between different elements in a scene, and so on. This is not simply about excluding extraneous elements – even if I intended to crop the image from whatever I saw in the viewfinder – although this is also a factor (see the tree image I discussed here recently and the grass in the bottom right of the image: 1, 2). Rather, for me, it is about expanding the view of the scene as a whole, about being able to encompass the elements that form the shapes, colours and tones in a way that enables a more holistic image to emerge.  That is what I want to achieve, and I know that I do that, but not always as consistently as I would like.

At Achnahaird Bay, looking south

At Achnahaird Bay, looking south

Of course, this is just me.  Other participants will hopefully have found something in Bruce’s critiques (there were 2-3 hours of image critiques on every day but one; other participants also commented on images) that helped them with whatever they thought they needed – or perhaps that they didn’t know they needed.

A month or two ago I removed all the landscape galleries from this site.  There really was a lot of rubbish there, in amidst some images that I liked.  Before going to Assynt I had begun the process of recreating the galleries and they are gradually going to reappear, but this time with far fewer, more carefully selected images.  In general, I make photographs for myself and not for others: being clearer about what I’m doing is therefore essential, and I feel the week away with Bruce has enabled me to see much more clearly exactly what kind of images I want to create, and given me more tools to enable me to go about doing that.  Those are the images I want to show here.

In essence, I feel I am approaching my photography with new confidence, a clearer sense of why I’m doing it, and how to go about achieving what I want. So in answer to my correspondent: that’s why I wanted to go on this workshop! :)

New book from Bruce Percy – first impressions

This lunch time I went to pick up my pre-ordered copy of Bruce Percy’s new book from his office. Here are some snapshots of the book on my living room table (that really don’t do it justice – sorry about the yellow ceiling light, forgot to fix white balance!):

Bruce Percy, The Art of Adventure

Bruce Percy, The Art of Adventure

There are 40 images with descriptive text, laid out like this:

Bruce Percy, The Art of Adventure, sample page

Bruce Percy, The Art of Adventure, sample page

About 3/4 of the images are landscapes from all over the world, the remainder street portraiture from some of Bruce’s trips to various countries in Asia and South America.

It’s a fabulous book – it feels lovely, looks beautiful, and the images are printed fantastically well – they almost feel three dimensional. In fact, they look as if they could almost be prints that have been bound into a book – this book is itself a work of art, a thing of great beauty. Michael Kenna has written a very lovely introduction. And I’m very touched that Bruce has mentioned me in the acknowledgements (I was involved in proof-reading the text earlier this year).

Bruce Percy's signature

Bruce Percy

Oh, and yes, I did get a signed one… :)

The book is available now from Half Light Press (and at the moment only from them – don’t fall for Amazon’s cheaper price, because Amazon won’t be able to deliver them at this price and will simply tell you it is not available). I think Beyond Words will also be selling them soon. Half Light also have offers with selected prints from Bruce. The first edition is limited to 1000 copies, and when I picked mine up earlier today, substantial numbers were being packed up to be sent off (all sold pre-publication).

I’ve bought quite a few photography books this year, and this and Michael Kenna’s Huangshan are the two highlights.

BUY ONE! In fact, BUY TWO and give one away to someone you love…! :)

Mamiya 645 ProTL query – help from anyone out there?

I have a Mamiya 645 ProTL with the prism viewfinder and the motor-drive.  There are two battery power sources: one small 6.5V cell in the main body, and 6AA cells in the motor-drive.

The meter and the shutter are, as I understand it, operated from the small 6.5V cell, whilst the AA cells are just for the motor-drive.  I almost always take multiple spot readings with my Sekonic meter, relying only rarely on the camera’s meter (basically, when I think the AV measurement will be sufficient – I’ve found the spot meter to be slightly off, and I trust my Sekonic meter more), but last week the camera meter just stopped working altogether.  This has happened a couple of times before, and I’m beginning to wonder if there’s some kind of reason for/pattern to this, and if others have experienced the same thing.

I replaced the 6.5V cell (I had a new spare in the camera bag) and that had no effect.  I then, despite being fairly sure this would have no effect, also replaced the AA cells with new ones – I was right, this didn’t make it work either.  Strangely, the shutter seemed to work just fine, and the battery check light for all combinations of battery was also ok.

When I came home, I tested all the batteries with a multimeter and they were all fine (so I put the old ones back in!).  I took the prism viewfinder off the camera body and there was no debris or dirt visible that would impact on the electrical contacts.  When I reattached it and tried the meter again, it flickered, and then worked.  I thought this meant a loose contact between the prism meter and the camera body but have checked this multiple times and it is all really firmly held together, so I don’t think it is dirt/loose contacts between the body and the viewfinder.  If there is internal damage to the contacts, I’ll have a hard time fixing that, but if there’s another explanation, I’d like to know more.

Anyone have any ideas why this might be happening?  If you know anything about this – particularly how to avoid it happening! – do please share, either in the comments, or by email here.

Thank you very much for your help!

A couple of new images (continued)

Regarding the second image in my blog posting from earlier today, I here have a black and white version of the image.  The crop is almost 3×2, which I felt didn’t work too well in the colour version, but oddly enough does seem to be ok here (I think): it has the advantage that it cuts out the stray out-of-focus grass in the bottom right corner, but has the disadvantage that the curve of the lake has almost completely gone.  One of the other things that the conversion to black and white has enabled is the application (in Photoshop) of a colour filter that takes away the rich green from all the vegetation and leaves: this richness was a bit distracting compared to the tree as the main focus, and the relatively long exposure needed in the early morning light meant that the ever-so-gentle breeze moved them.  That is almost imperceptible in the monochrome version, and makes it better, I think.

Interestingly, I realise I’ve just there argued a case for the monochrome version, which I had created at the same time as editing the colour one!

Ratzeburg, lakeside tree, summer 2011

Ratzeburg, lakeside tree, summer 2011

Comments, as always, are welcome!

A couple of new images

I have not posted any landscape images for a while.  I’m aware that some of what I am doing in the landscape is changing and that has made me reluctant to put anything up.  There will be more considered reflection on that another time, but here are a couple of new images that I identify as part of this process.  Both were taken on Fuji Velvia 50 film using my medium format camera and the 150mm lens.  Click on an image to see it a little larger (800 pixels across).  Comments are most welcome, either below or by email – thanks.

A early morning view onto one of the lakes in Ratzeburg, Schleswig-Holstein, in northern Germany:

Ratzeburg Lake, summer 2011

Ratzeburg Lake, summer 2011

This next image is from the same lake:

Ratzeburg, lakeside tree, summer 2011

Ratzeburg, lakeside tree, summer 2011

I look forward to hearing what you think – thanks!

[Added later: following the comments from Rob Hudson below, I created another blog posting with a monochrome version of the second image.]

A week of reading and photography

This was to be a week of reading and photography on the Isle of Mull in a lovely cottage I’ve stayed in several times before in Bunessan (“The Stables”) and can recommend highly. Here’s a summary of the week.

    Monday

Arrive, after a spectacular journey through Glencoe. Mentioning this on Twitter causes considerable jealousy amongst certain followers (you know who you are, guys and gals!). Settle down to watch a rubbish film in the evening. :)

    Tuesday

Morning: reading – lovely. Afternoon: photography – lovely. Evening: a bit more reading – lovely. And then a rubbish film – well…!

    Wednesday

Dawn photography, Ardalanish Bay. I mention this on Twitter, again provoking more envious comments (as before…). Shopping in the “big city” (Tobermory). More reading – wonderful. And then the day is rounded off with another rubbish film. Another good day.

    Thursday

More dawn photography – lovely. Read a good PhD thesis: very enjoyable. Evening – nice dinner, followed by next rubbish film. It has rained from mid-morning on, but I don’t care: another good day.

    Friday

Most of the last night is spent between bathroom and bed, with a severely upset stomach. I am in bed all day. I have no idea if it is raining or not. A bad day.

    Saturday

Feel somewhat restored, but still fairly knackered after being ill, so that an hour’s walk in the woods wears me out completely. It rains all day. I manage to do virtually no reading without falling asleep over my books, so go to bed early. Not a great day.

    Sunday

Completely restored to health and wholeness – and off home. Knowing that the ferry’s winter timetable begins today, I have printed it off in advance of leaving home – and am very pleased with how organised I am. Unfortunately, I’m not organised enough to actually look at it. This means I miss the numerous would-be summer ferries that were running every Sunday from March until last Sunday, and have a four hour wait in Fishnish. What is there in Fishnish? A jetty; a coffee shop (closed). It rains. A lot. All day. I am ribbed endlessly by other family members for the timetable faux pas, but am now on the way home (this being mostly written on the jetty, and then posted on the ferry!).

All in all, not too bad a week, though with less reading and less photography than I had hoped for. Hopefully there will some images on here sometime soon, and my book chapter has progressed a bit.

PS And the rubbish films? All four of the Pirates of the Caribbean efforts… quite a contrast to the weather and climate on Mull… and whilst I recommend the cottage, I don’t recommend the films!

Middle Eastern Christians and Scottish islands

So this is the beginning of my reading week – I arrived on the Isle of Mull yesterday and this morning I was reading and writing about Middle Eastern Christians. This afternoon I’ve gone out with the camera and the dog, and we’ve been rained and hailed on once so far, for about five minutes. Otherwise, it’s alternated between glorious sunshine and cloud, but with very strong winds all the time. In fact, the winds have been so strong that I was worried I couldn’t keep the camera still enough using Velvia 50, even pulling the tripod into the ground and with weights hanging from it. So I used up the roll and have now put a faster film in the camera (Portra 160) in the hope that the faster shutter speeds that enables – 1/250 and thereabouts instead of 1/30 at f8 – will help keep the images steady (I had the Velvia in from the last time I was out). Here’s the view at the moment (from my mobile – not even that is easy to hold still!):

Isle of Mull

Isle of Mull

I just know this is going to be a wonderful week: reading and writing and taking photographs… I could get used to this! I’ll be going back to my books in a while, but in the meantime, I’ll explore a little more of this hill (which, as it happens, is one of the few places I get a mobile signal – the mobile doesn’t work in the cottage or any where in the village… perfect!).

It’s a tough life! :)

Musings on film latitude and related matters

I’ve posted very little here recently, and have only added a couple of incidental items on my micro-blog.  This has two main reasons: I’ve been very busy travelling for work (Germany, Norway, England in the last four weeks), and I’ve also had quite a backlog of films to scan and process.  Concentrating on film and finding a revised routine to my workflow – now that I think I’ve understood what I’m doing with my new Epson scanner – takes time, and after various false starts, I think I’m finally getting there.  There is now, of course, a bit of a backlog of both film and digital images (I’ve not stopped photographing!), and coupled with a desire to redo the galleries here, you’ll appreciate that I’m struggling a bit…

A beautiful Rollei image, as scanned

A beautiful Rollei image, as scanned

However, this posting is tangential to all of these thoughts!  I have, partly because of the 1953 Project (and yes, there are images to go online from that, too!), occasionally been carrying the Rolleiflex with me as a ‘casual camera’.  This regularly elicits interesting conversations with complete strangers, which can be surprising and very nice.  For example, last week I was dining with a friend in London and after our meal I wanted to photograph her with the Rollei; a couple at a neighbouring table began talking to us about the camera, photography and so on… culminating in a request that I might consider photographing their wedding next year; of course, I declined!

Adobe Lightroom settings

Adobe Lightroom settings

The film I’m using for the 1953 Project is Ilford FP4Plus, which is rated at an ISO of 125.  Ilford’s website says it has ‘enormous latitude for exposure error above and below‘ this speed.  I chose it for the project partly for this reason, thinking it wouldn’t much matter if the exposure was slightly off on my portraits because I could always recover the images once they were scanned in.  I didn’t realise quite what ‘enormous’ meant to Ilford, but these images clearly show that.  The first image above is the scan from the negative (Vuescan reversed the negative for me).  I made adjustments in Lightroom, as this screen capture shows: upping the exposure by four stops, pushing the fill light and brightness up, and then reducing the contrast and clarity settings to bring the grain under control.  Aside from dust removal, these are the only changes I made to the image, revealing… Elizabeth Eva Leach, Professor of Music at Oxford University, with whom I had a stimulating lunch at the beginning of September (click on the photograph to go to her blog):

Elizabeth Eva Leach

Elizabeth Eva Leach

It’s not a great portrait, but it astonishes me that it worked at all, not just because of the film exposure issues: the café was relatively dark and I could barely see anything on the ground glass (so focusing was mostly a lucky guess), the lens was wide open at f2.8 with an exposure speed of 1/10th of a second – and yet it’s reasonably sharp despite all this!  And this isn’t a coincidence: another portrait taken under similar circumstances was just as underexposed and with similar Lightroom adjustments it came out fine too:

Another Ilford FP4Plus sample, with similar exposure settings

Another Ilford FP4Plus sample, with similar exposure settings

What I love about all this is the visceral nature of the film and the process.  For sure, I could have taken these portraits on a digital camera and bumped up the auto ISO settings – but I’m not convinced they would have looked any ‘better’ (they would have been different…).  Of course, even the process of ‘extracting’ an image from an almost entirely black square of film gives me enormous pleasure – it’s like finding a treasure!  I don’t regard myself by any means as a format fetishist, but returning to film does give me huge pleasure: my use of the Mamiya for landscapes makes me photograph with much greater consideration and precision than I used to with the digital camera, and I LOVE that.

For example, here’s a dawn image from the Mamiya taken on Velvia 50 of the Ratzeburg Küchensee in northern Germany this August.  I remember taking quite a while to compose it in order to make sure the twisted twigs were below the tree line, whereas I think with a digital camera I might have fired off a good half-dozen shots at different heights and then hoped one had worked when I was back at the computer – but here I composed slowly and carefully, got it right, and then made… two exposures (er… the first one had a misplaced graduated filter that I noticed after squeezing the cable release!).

Küchensee, Ratzeburg

Küchensee, Ratzeburg

(I’ve lightened the exposure by half a stop and added a little fill light, otherwise it’s as it came from the scanner.)

In a few weeks’ time I’m off to Assynt with Bruce Percy.  I’m really looking forward to this, and though I’ll take my Mamiya, I will mostly use the Nikon D90 so that images can be readily critiqued by Bruce and the group.  I’m keen to observe myself with this, as it were: I’m sure my recent return to film will have changed how I use the digital camera for landscapes.  Before going to Assynt, I’m also going to the Isle of Mull for a week of secluded reading – and I may just take a photograph or two whilst I’m there…

Feeding the addiction…

This morning’s postal delivery included:

Feeding the addiction

Feeding the addiction

Now if only I could find the time for all the scanning/sorting/editing…!

Adding new interpretations to the display of landscape photographs

My son’s addition of a Lego Star Wars character adds a new interpretation to my landscape prints in our house:

Star Wars and landscapes

Star Wars and landscapes

I’m not completely sure what it adds to the photographs, but it certainly adds something!

Visiting Bergen, one of the most beautiful cities in the world

I am currently in Bergen, Norway, for a work conference that is due to start in a little while. Bergen is without a doubt one of my favourite cities in the world, and I love returning here – even the 30 minutes on the airport bus to the city centre is a delight!

I haven’t been able to bring my medium format camera as I had initially planned (I would have had to leave some essentials for the conference behind, and I didn’t feel I could justify that!), but I did bring my Nikon D90 and a couple of the small prime lenses. I’m staying on for meetings for a couple of days after the conference, and plan to get out early in the morning and late at night with the camera on those days.

In the meantime, here’s an impression of the harbour last night, with the 50mm/f1.4 lens at 20 seconds/f8. The camera is resting on a post.

Bergen harbour at night

Bergen harbour at night

[NB This posting was imported from another blog I once used, and the comments do not therefore follow the exact pattern of normal posts.]

A wee taster: large format photography

Large Format Landscape Photography WorkshopsA long time ago I booked for a May one-day workshop exploring large-format photography; I had to postpone this because of my broken arm, and went this weekend instead. I hope to show one of two of the images at a later date if they’re any good, but spending a take exploring what large format cameras are capable of, and the possibilities they offer, was great.

Theoretically knowing what such things can do is quite different to experiencing it, to trying it.  As someone suggested to me, it’s a bit like knowing  about cars in theory, but actually doing the driving is quite different.  This was just an introduction, but the two workshop leaders, Dav Thomas and Tim Parkin, worked well together to explain what we were aiming for and how to achieve particular things.  After showing us some of the mechanics of the cameras and why certain things worked they did, we had a go at focusing on trees in the middle-distance and heather and grasses in the foreground – if you’ve never used an LF camera before, this isn’t as straightforward as it sounds, though very satisfying when it finally works!

After lunch, we went up the hill and took some photographs.  For a newbie, it takes a long time to frame and focus each image, so, including a walk to the top of a hill (and a quick march back down at the end of the day in the pouring rain!), I took three photographs in just under 4 hours.  I think setting up, framing and focusing took between about 20 and 45 minutes – perhaps I’m just slow, but I think the other three people on the workshop were taking just as long.  Of course, it does get faster with practice – I started with a complicated composition in the woods that didn’t really work as well as it might have done had the sun shone consistently.  I then moved to another spot, and took time to get that set up correctly… a good 45 minutes, I think!  My third and final image was simpler in composition and took about 20 minutes, and I was able to release the shutter just as the first drops of rain came down.

So why go for large format?  Aside from the phenomenal detail and corresponding image size involved, for me the attraction would be in what it becomes possible to do when you can tilt and shift the lens and the back of the camera independently of one another.  Last night, after coming back from the Peak District, I found myself dreaming of retaking this image:

Goslpie harbour, final image

Goslpie harbour, final image

When I was in the harbour I wanted the lines of the jetty to be straight and for the coils of rope in the foreground to be visible, as they were when I looked at it without the camera, but it was an impossible effect to achieve with an SLR (these were taken on a DSLR).  Here is the ‘straight out of the camera’ image:

Golspie harbour, from camera

Golspie harbour, from camera

Straightening the lines of the jetty has introduced distortion – still acceptable, I think – into some of the other elements of the image, such as the white boat on the left and the blue boat in the foreground.  It’s also removed part of the coils.  I knew that I wanted what became the final image, and knew that if I took it as it was I could ‘fix’ the perspective in Photoshop.  But with a LF camera, such post-processing changes could have been largely unnecessary, or at least much reduced.  A tilt-shift lens could probably have helped me here as well, but in terms of cost, it seems to me to make more sense just to go with a LF set-up instead of a tilt-shift lens – and then one can benefit from the quality and flexibility of LF too.

So is a LF camera going to be added to my collection of tools in the future?  The one concern I have is that I struggled with the dark-cloth – I know that I am a little claustrophobic and it required considerable will-power to spend long periods setting up each shot under the dark cloth.  A black fleece jacket, which is much more open than the professional cloths Dav and Tim offered, might be a better solution for me.  I think my next step will be to borrow an LF camera sometime and play a little more with it, but I see no reason NOT to invest, once my finances allow!

In the meantime, if you’re wondering whether this might be something for you, or you just want to try something a bit different, do go on one of Dav and Tim’s courses – it was enjoyable, informative, and the two of them are a good team.

My morning view!

I am on a hillside, with a still calm dawn enveloping me at Castlelaw Hill Fort, outside Edinburgh.

Pentland Hills

Pentland Hills

It is not so good for the dog – I forgot it is a sheep farm, so there is no question of him roaming freely whilst I play with my camera…

A photograph of my politics

I love this graffiti at the end of Portobello beach in Edinburgh – not least because a good part of my politics is summed up in this one line!  I think it’s probably only something worth photographing on a grey and gloomy day, and so today was perfect.

Capitalism isn't working...

Capitalism isn't working...

I very much hope the Council isn’t going to be removing this any time soon…

Portobello skies

An iPhone snapshot from the beach at the bottom of my road.

Portobello skies (iPhone 4)

Portobello skies (iPhone 4)

I took it immediately after taking this almost identical image using my Nikon D90 with a 10-24mm lens at 12mm.  Because I had forgotten to take a filter holder with me for it (I had the filter ring on the lens and an ND grad in my pocket that would have been great for this!), the skies are partially blown out, so I’ve tried to recover that a little on the computer.  Aside from adding a vignette here, I’ve not made any other significant changes to this image.  Taking into account the iPhone’s tiny sensor and lens etc. etc., I’m pleasantly impressed with what it managed to produce compared to the D90.

Portobello skies (Nikon D90)

Portobello skies (Nikon D90)